Why can't the ten gods be divided into absolutely good and bad?

Ten Gods is not a list of good guys and bad guys. A good official is not necessarily a good one, Seven Kills is not necessarily a bad one, a wounded official is not necessarily troublesome, and partial wealth is not necessarily a windfall. Each of the Ten Gods is simply a relational function between the Sun Lord and other forces. Whether the function can be used depends on the structure, location, strength, circulation and stage.

It is also an official killing. If the Sun Lord can bear it and the Seal Star can transform it, it may be responsibility, goal, position and order; if the Sun Lord is not able to bear it and the food injury affects the official, it may be stress, confrontation and anxiety. It is also a wounded official. If there is financial support, it may be expression and realization; if there is no support, it may be impulsive, picky and unrestrained.

• ·Is it a trend in the market, or is it just showing up.
• ·Whether it helps, consumes, restrains, or vents with the Japanese master, or it can form a transformation.
• ·Does it have an inheritance path in reality, such as positions, works, resources, learning, relationships or rules?

The same ten gods have different tone in the Year Pillar, Month Pillar, Sun Branch and Hour Pillar. The Year Pillar is toward the background, the Moon Pillar is toward growth and current power, the Day Branch is toward intimacy and self-acceptance, and the Hour Pillar is toward the back and extension. If you only look at the names of the ten gods without looking at their positions, it will be written as a template.

A originally quiet Ten Gods may be pushed to the forefront when the Great Fortune passes; a Ten Gods with a strong destiny may be subdued or inspired at a certain stage. To judge the ten gods, you can't just look at the static, but also when it is enlarged and whether there are corresponding scenes in reality.

A better way to ask is not "Is this Ten Gods good?" but "Can it be used, where can it be used, at what cost, and when is it likely to become unbalanced?" Only in this way can we write an article with content, rather than a personality list of the Ten Gods.

Wounding officer, seven kills, and robbing wealth don't sound gentle, but they don't necessarily mean they are bad; Zhengguan, Zhengyin, and Zhengcai sound upright, but they don't necessarily mean they are good. Evaluation comes from structure, not from name.

The wounded official can be creativity or collision; the seven kills can be execution or anxiety; the positive seal can be the learning system or dependence. It depends on how it is taken over.

Replace "good or bad" with "what this force is doing, whether it is suitable, and whether it can be taken over." The article will be much more professional and readers will not be trapped in labels.

The same ten gods may play different roles in career, relationship, wealth, and study. If you talk about whether it is good or bad without the context of the problem, the judgment will become empty. Follow the movement of the subject and you will know whether it is a helper or a hindrance at the moment.

Rather than saying "this star is good" and "that star is bad" in a flat way, a better way to write it is to think of it as a three-dimensional character: what it promotes, what it limits, what it relies on, and who it easily conflicts with. This will make it easier for readers to truly understand the Ten Gods system.