What do the citations of evidence in the report mean?

The most common question about astrological reports is not whether there are explanations, but where these explanations come from. The significance of evidence citation is to pin a natural language conclusion back to the locatable data layer. It tells the user which planets, houses, aspects or structures this judgment corresponds to, rather than being written out based on tone of voice.

Once this layer of transparency is established, the entire report changes from a sensory text to a reviewable text.

Many people regard citations as additional information, and it seems that it doesn't matter if they don't read it. In fact, for mature users, the reference itself is the reading path. If you read the conclusion first, and then follow the references back to the phase table, palace lord table, and ephemeris table, you can see how complete the evidence chain of this sentence is.

This will allow users to gradually learn to verify themselves, rather than just passively receiving it.

A conclusion is more qualified to be read as a main line if it cites multiple layers of repeated evidence, such as the same theme being supported by planets, houses, aspects, and time. On the other hand, if the quote is thin and has only a single clue, it will be easier for users to understand why it is just a hint and not a conclusion.

Quotations not only support the conclusion but also set boundaries for the conclusion.

The best way for users to use it is not to skip the reference when they see it, but to actively check back when they come across a conclusion that they are particularly interested in. For key topics such as relationships, career, migration, and commitment, first look at what the report says, then look at what structures it cites, and finally compare it with real-life experience.

At this time, the quotation is no longer just an explanation, but helps users establish their own sense of judgment.