Who is more important, good fortune or fleeting years?

The great luck is like the climate, and the passing year is like the weather. The climate determines the general direction, and the weather determines the specific movements of the year.

Let’s first look at the background of the Grand Canal, and then look at the fleeting time to determine the trigger. Just looking at the passing years, it is easy to mistake short-term fluctuations for long-term conclusions.

If the fleeting year is strong but the luck and destiny are not connected, many things will only fluctuate briefly and may not really come to fruition.

The Universiade is like the background color of a period of time, telling you which themes have a higher proportion in the long term; the fleeting years are like the touch points of this year, telling you which areas are highlighted. The background color remains unchanged, and no matter how strong the contact point is, it may only be a short-term fluctuation.

If the fleeting time brings an opportunity, but the fortune has no background and the destiny cannot take it, this opportunity may just pass by. In turn, the Universiade has pushed the theme to the forefront, and if it is triggered again in the fleeting year, the sense of reality will be much stronger.

Use the Universiade to look at long-term trends, and use the fleeting years to look at annual events. Don't describe the ups and downs of one year as the trend of ten years, and don't regard the background of ten years as the good or bad luck of a certain year. Only when the levels are clearly distinguished can the judgment be stable.

Good fortune is more like the road you are walking on, while fleeting time is more like the road where there are sudden road signs, obstacles or entrances. No matter how obvious the fork is, it won't completely deviate from the path you originally took. This metaphor can help readers understand the relationship between the two levels of time more intuitively.

A better expression is to first write "What is the main line of this decade" and then "Which point was triggered specifically in this year". By splitting the two layers and writing them, it will be easier for readers to understand, and it will not be easy for readers to misread the ups and downs of the year as a summary of the overall Universiade.

If the Universiade has pushed a certain theme to the foreground and triggers it again in a fleeting year, the sense of event will be much stronger. If the Universiade is not supportive, the fleeting signal may just be a gust of wind. When making a judgment, you must first ask whether the matter has ten years of background.

There are many possibilities for great fortune in the same step, and the passing years will light up one of them. For example, a piece of wealth may appear as income in a certain year, as expenses in a certain year, and as cooperation in a certain year. The fleeting year is responsible for concreteness, not for rewriting the fortune.

Don't write "This year's good fortune means it must be good." A better way to write it is: This step of Universiade provides a certain background, and this year's fleeting year triggers a certain line, so certain types of themes are more likely to appear. Write in layers to make your judgment clearer.

The Great Fortune is not a one-way street of good or bad luck. A trigger may bring opportunities and costs; it may open windows or expose old problems. The article should write "what can be advanced" and "where defense is needed" at the same time, otherwise it will be like a fortune-telling slogan.

The timeline article should tell readers at the end what to observe: whether themes recur, whether there is an entrance to reality, whether pressure accumulates, whether there is a relay from consecutive years. Observable indicators are more useful and less misleading than saying "It will change this year."

The Universiade mainly determines which types of themes have confidence in this decade. The fleeting time is based on this background, amplifying the touch points to a degree that attracts people's attention. Only when the two are separated can the article have a time layer.

If the Universiade does not open up a certain theme, no matter how fast the fleeting time is, it can only be illuminated; if the Universiade has pushed it to the forefront, the fleeting year will be more like a specific time point of the year. If the article does not adjust the hierarchy, it will read an annual list.

A good way to write it is to let the Universiade provide direction, and then break it into specific actions as the years pass. Never go the other way and write down specific events as a conclusion of Universiade. Leave it blank so that the text will understand that great luck is not the result, but the background.