Why are common folk assertions easily misleading?

Predictions from ancient books and folk formulas have empirical value, but they often come from specific eras, specific life structures, and specific cases. Moving directly to modern life, it is easy to become rigid. For example, certain judgments about marriage, career, and male and female roles need to be re-translated today.

Predicates can be used as a reference but cannot replace structural judgment.

Many formulas are short because they omit conditions: star status, palace combination, influence of the four transformations, succession of auxiliary evil spirits, and triggering of luck. Readers only see one conclusion and assume that it must happen.

To really use assertions, you need to fill in the omitted conditions.

In ancient times, it meant going abroad, migration, official career, land and residence, and marriage. In modern times, it may correspond to cross-city development, platform exposure, career system, asset allocation, intimate relationships, and family negotiation. Without translation, the judgment will become harsh and inaccurate.

Ziwei Learning Page allows traditional experience to enter a modern context.

Be careful when you directly use assertions to scare people, saying you will leave, you will lose, you will get sick, you will break. People are not victims of a formula. Responsible content should talk about structure, conditions, risks and treatments.

If assertions do not help people understand reality, they should not be used to create a sense of authority.