Related questions
Is it necessarily bad to use Ji Ji?
A reliable starting point is the article's main conclusion: When reading Ziwei's chart, don't start with "whether a certain star is good or not", but first determine the life body, the main axis of the palace, the three directions and four directions, and then look at the four transformations and the time layer.
How to assess it
Do not decide from a single keyword. First identify whether the question concerns a definition, relationship, work, timing, choice, or personal state. Then check the relevant structure and supporting evidence before drawing a conclusion.
What to check
- ·Confirm what the question is actually asking and which level of the system it belongs to.
- ·Check the main evidence instead of relying on one isolated symbol or keyword.
- ·Compare the conclusion with context, nearby factors, and real-world conditions.
What layer to return to
Don’t rush to look at a single star yet
Newbies are most likely to be distracted by Xing Yao: they feel nervous when they see Qisha, they feel relieved when they see Tianfu, and they feel finished when they see Huaji. By reading the disk in this way, the conclusion will be very quick, but it is also very thin. Ziwei's first step is not to ask "Is this star good?" but to ask: What question does this disk want to answer now? Which house does this question belong to? With which houses does this house form evidence?
Common misreads
- !Treating one keyword as a final verdict.
- !Ignoring context, timing, or the rest of the structure.
- !Turning a tendency into an absolute prediction.
Review order
Next step
After reading this answer, return to the tool and test the same question against a concrete reading or result. Use the article as a reading order, not as a fixed verdict.