What do you think of the pattern of Ziwei Dou Shuli?

When many people learn from Ziwei, they are most likely to be attracted by the pattern: as soon as a certain combination appears, they want to use the words "wealth", "unconventional" and "success or failure". Pattern is important, of course, but it's not a button. The real pattern is a stable structure formed by the palace position, stars, four modernizations, auxiliary evil spirits, temple prosperity and time layers. If you jump to a conclusion after seeing only a name, you are often using the title of an ancient book instead of reading the disk.

The value of pattern is to help us see the organizational methods that appear repeatedly in the birth chart: how resources are gathered, how pressure is released, whether advantages are inherited, and whether breaches can be repaired.

Any pattern requires conditions. Is the ruler in the right house? Is there any support for the three directions and four directions? Will the Four Modernizations send power into the main line? Does Sha Yao destroy the inheritance, or provide a breakthrough? Is Ji Yao an actual resource, or just a decoration? If the conditions are not uniform, the so-called pattern may just be a similar appearance.

For example, a market that seems to have a management structure may not be able to stabilize the situation in reality if the money cannot be taken over, the transfer cannot open up the external field, and the merits are depleted for a long time. The pattern is not the name on the birth chart, but the structure that can work in reality.

The word "unconventional" can easily scare people. A more mature understanding is that the originally seemingly smooth structure has certain conditions that prevent it from functioning in an ideal way. The exception may be due to resource shortages, errors caused by the four modernizations, excessive price of evil spirits, temporary uncooperativeness of the time layer, or it may simply be that the real environment does not support it.

Breaking the rules is not a death sentence. On the contrary, it can tell people: where resources need to be supplemented, where risks need to be reduced, where one cannot be greedy for speed, and where one needs to change the way of expression. If Ziwei's article only writes about whether the pattern is expensive, but does not write about how the pattern is established and how it fails, it will still be superficial.

The purpose of judging the pattern is not to label people as "quaker" or "loser", but to output strategies. For a pioneering pattern, you need to know when to rush and when to defend; for a resource-based pattern, you need to know how to preserve it and how to avoid comfort; for a changing pattern, you need to know how to establish review and risk buffers.

A good pattern needs to be managed, and a weak pattern also has room for repair. Reading the pattern well will let people know how their own structure plays out, instead of making people obsessed with the horoscope hierarchy.